Posts Tagged ‘Operators’

iPhone 3G goes on sale in India Tomorrow; Wide-spread Disappointment among Public

Thursday, August 21st, 2008

Two of India’s biggest mobile service providers, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone have now officially announced the availability and pricing for the iPhone, ending over 2 months of rumors and speculations. The iPhone 3G goes on sale on August 22nd, 2008 throughout the country.

India, a country of over 350 million mobile subscribers has long waited for the launch of the iPhone in India. However, everyone who was eagerly anticipating the launch was in for a rude shock when the two operators announced the pricing of the iPhone. According to the official press-releases from both the operators, the 8GB model of the iPhone 3G has been priced at Rs. 31,00 (GBP 382) while the 16GB model (both Black and White versions) have been priced at Rs. 36,100 (GBP 445). Even though the iPhone 3G is being offered without any contract in the country, it will still be locked to the respective carrier.

However, the users do not seem to have taken the pricing announcements well. They seem to left everyone in a tussle as to why a device that was touted to be ‘half the price’ actually turned out to be four times more. People from all walks of life are voicing their opinions on Twitter and other online discussion forums. As it turns out, every one was expecting the iPhone 3G to be priced at par with the price that was announced for the US market – $199.

Now, I do not blame the carriers for the pricing. The Indian telecom market behaves very distinctively, where the subsidized system or yearly contracts do not work. A majority a subscribers in the country are prepaid subscribers. A large portion of the 350 million people use handsets from the entry-level segments. This leaves only a select few people who use smartphones. Other than the Blackberry phones in the country, almost all phones sold in the country are no-contract, unlocked phones. Thus, there was no way the Indian carriers could have chosen Apple’s preferred system of subsidizing the phone.

Mobile aficionados and the elite mobile users in the country, however, would not be as surprised or as disappointed as the general public. This is because Apple products in the country are known for their flaunt value, not use. Apple is pre-dominantly known because of the range of iPods sold in the country. So popular are the iPods, that pretty-much all music players have come to be regarded as ‘iPods’, even if they are the cheap, chinese make. With all the hype surrounding the iPhone, people had comfortably set in to the fact that it would become another gadget with very high flaunt value. Thus, users looking to buy the phone for this sole purpose would buy it, no matter what price it came for. Speaking to one of the dealers in the gray-markets, I was told that the iPhone 3G was available for Rs. 65,000 (GBP 800) and he had already sold over 10 such pieces. This could well give you an indication of the craziness for the iPhone that had dwelled upon the people.

So how would the iPhone fare in the Indian Market? Not so well, if you ask me.

1. The iPhone has been launched in a market where individuals think twice before spending anything over Rs. 15,000 (GBP 185) for their handsets. Again, he does not wish to be bound in a contract by the carrier, and is free to change carriers everyday if he wishes to. It is only the elite individuals that spend upwards of Rs. 15K on their phones, though they comprise only a small portion of the total population.

2. The market is predominantly ruled by Nokia and Sony-Ericsson phones, with Samsung or Motorola not too far behind. These companies are known to add much of the high-end features into all their phone. Hence, features such as High-Megapixeled cameras, video recordings, ability to forward text messages, memory expansion slots are seen as a necessity by everyone, something that lacks in the iPhone.

3. Absence of 3G network. It may be hard to believe, but a country of 350 million mobile subscribers does not have 3G networks. This makes one of the best feature of the iPhone to be rendered useless in the country. Not just that, the GPRS and EDGE services offered my many operators are pathetic to say the least. This again makes browsing on iPhone a not-so-enjoyable task. Finding WiFi spots in the country is as easy as finding a water fountain in the desert.

4. No iTunes Store makes a lot less enjoyable. Yes, Apple did launch the iTunes Store for India and other surrounding countries, but the only things available there are the Apps from the App Store. This, again, requires the user to have a user account by signing up with a credit card, something which is not easy to find among a majority of the mobile subscribers. And the lack of media content via the iTunes Store is not acceptable either.

The iPhone competes head on with the likes of Nokia N-series and E-series phones like the N95, N82, E71 and the K and W series phones from Sony-Ericsson. To counter-attack the iPhone launch, Nokia announced the launch of the much anticipated N96 in the Indian Market, a whole month before its launch in the US. Although it will be priced around the same price as the 16GB version of iPhone 3G, it carries a much wider feature-set and a brand name that the Indians are accustomed to. Obviously, it would be the preferred choice.

Bharti Airtel has decided to have a launch event at the stroke of midnight tonight, opening the gates to three of its many stores in the country. The phones will be provided on a first come-first serve basis. However, I fail to see people lining up outside the stores for the gadget. The only people who’d turn up for the event would be news reporters and a few fanboys.

Are operators blocking free US mobile broadband?

Friday, August 15th, 2008

Over in the US, there’s an interesting plan brewing. The Federal Communications Commission is planning to auction a piece of spectrum off under the proviso that the winner of the auction has to offer a free wireless internet service with part of the spectrum.

Operators, it seems, have been dragging their feet and causing delays, saying they need to do technical testing to make sure the new service won’t cause any interference with the mobile services already out there.

From the New York TImes:

Representatives Anna Eshoo and Edward Markey suggested the operators might have other motives. “We are concerned that incumbent wireless carriers are seeking unnecessary and unprecedented testing delays to prevent new innovative competitors from entering the market,” they wrote in a letter to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin

How many times have we seen this sort of scenario? Operators see something coming that’s inexorable yet they reckon it will hurt their bottom line, so they drag their feet for as long as they can rather than thinking up new ways to make sure they stay ahead of the competition. Fingers crossed we see this free wireless service as soon as possible.

UK needs age ratings for under-18 mobile content

Wednesday, August 13th, 2008

Guess what? The mobile industry is actually doing something right for once. Yep, according to watchdog Ofcom, the system of self regulation operators have in place to stop kids getting their hands on adult material before they’re 18 is working out fine, although it did administer a gentle slap on the wrist over information: apparently precious few of us know how about the age verification mechanisms used to block kids from accessing inappropriate content.

Ofcom did say:

“The current arrangements block access to 18-rated material to non-age-verified customers. With increasing numbers of younger children having access to mobiles capable of accessing AV content, mobile operators may need to consider if a binary system at 18 provides sufficient protection from inappropriate content for younger users, or whether a more granular system should be considered.”

The Guardian reckons that’s a sign that we’re going to get cinema style age ratings on mobile content. Not a bad idea, I reckon, assuming operators can put up with the hassle of verifying young customers’ ages – and if there’s a profit in it, I expect they can – I can really see it working.

“Mobile is the hottest new marketing channel”

Monday, August 11th, 2008

So reckons Edward T. Manzitti, vice president for research of the Direct Marketing Association, a trade group that recently released a study of mobile users’ responses to unsolicited offers (reports the New York Times).

Mr. Manzitti blames the fact that recipients often have to pay for text-message ads for much of the opposition to them. “If the carriers offered marketers a different type of pricing, where the marketer paid the cost rather than the consumer, you’d see a different type of response,” he said.

There’s a huge disconnect between real business and the mobile industry.

Real business people — like Mr Manzitti and his colleagues — are left dumbfounded, I’m sure, by the idiotic nonsense expounded by mobile operators.

How can you expect the medium of mobile to take off when it turns out that, in many cases, the people you’re targeting with your $20 annual subscription to the Jelly of the Month Club are actually being charged to receive your texts, because their mobile operator doesn’t live in this space-time-continuum?

We move on.

It’s a great new medium… but with teething problems galore.

(Thanks for the link, Jeremy).

Operators to charge for incoming calls?

Tuesday, June 17th, 2008

This doesn’t sound good. According to a number of reports, EC Commissioner Viviane Reding is planning to pare back mobile termination rates from 7p to around 1p. Funnily enough, mobile operators aren’t best pleased and have apparently told Reding that if she goes ahead with the cuts, they might be forced to charge customers to receive incoming calls.

Reding’s spokesman told the Telegraph: “Companies could introduce tariffs that made you pay to receive calls, but most consumers will not tolerate this. They will go elsewhere. This is an empty threat from the mobile phone companies.”

Too right. While operators in other countries might charge incoming call costs as the norm, trying to introduce a similar model in the UK years after the mobile market has matured would be something akin to operator suicide. Thankfully, it sounds like a lot of sabre rattling rather than a serious threat.

Finally! Operators getting turned on by off-portal users

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

I asked Oren Glaz, top chap at Olista to give me a perspective on how, in his experience, operators are reacting to off-portal data usage. With Consumer demand for dynamic mobile content continuing to grow (Source: IDC 2007) Oren takes a look at the current off-portal market trends and how operators can tap into the market and use it to their advantage.

Over to you, Oren…

- – -

Off-portal mobile services – the market today
The mobile industry, spearheaded by the network operators, has invested heavily in stimulating market growth through the provision of desirable phones, sophisticated network infrastructure, affordable rate plans, point-of-sale education and customer care. Operators initiated the first content-based services, made easily available to their subscribers through self-contained portals (or”decks”), effectively home pages for the mobile Web.

Just as in the early days of the PC Web, where users initially experienced the on-line world through a safe portal (e.g. AOL and MSN) before venturing out to find interesting and relevant sites and services directly, we are now starting to see increasingly wide browsing behaviour amongst off-portal users. Ironically, some of the internet players such as Google and Yahoo are now also pursuing mobile users.

How can the market leverage the off-portal trend?
The off-portal route-to-market is an attractive alternative to on-portal for a number of reasons, ranging from improving the user experience to billing. Ultimately though, they all result in an increase in potential usage opportunities for customers, operators and their partners, and finally any advertisers. In addition, carrier portals give more specialised and niche content providers access to a market they could not otherwise reach. In Europe alone, over seventy percent of content is consumed off-portal. These findings are based on statistics gleaned from monitoring over 11 million mobile data users in the last three months of 2007 for five different mobile operators across Europe, including several tier one operators.

As discussed previously, the mobile off-portal market is consistently growing, but the operator’s main revenue stream still comes from on-portal. This highlights how important it is for the operator to have visibility into what the user is doing when they go off-portal – to benefit its customers and any other involved parties in the mobile eco-system.

Having a detailed knowledge of what a user’s needs are enables operators to provide their customers with a better overall service. By understanding search patterns, looking at interests, quantifying search usage and the depth of navigation and stickiness, operators can include relevant and targeted information on their own portals, making the experience much easier and beneficial to their subscribers. For example, if a customer has a preference for a specific type of music, band or sports team, the marketing and advertising messages can adapted to meet these interests based upon this information.

This in turn is a great advantage to any operator partners, also for targeting but for billing purposes too. Having a detailed knowledge of when users have accessed a particular service means that the right charges can be applied for the right times. So if a customer subscribes to Mobile TV for a special rate for their first three months, but is still using it after this time, the partner will know immediately how much to bill overall, taking discounts into consideration. This ensures they do not suffer from any missed revenue or overcharge subscribers, both of which could happen without this level of information.

Customer behaviour and needs within the portal are one of the basic elements for defining the operator portal and off-portal strategy. Operators implementing Service Adoption Management (SAM) solutions can improve the home portal offering and structure to help users find what they are searching for and thus increase their satisfaction and consumption of content. This includes search effectiveness, which enables operators to understand how users are accessing their sites as well as identifying popular domains and pages, detect erroneous domains and general usability education barriers. It is also important that the operator can identify sites that do not encourage deep navigation due to handsets and thus optimise these sites through content adaptation. This enables the operator to engage with their customers with a better understanding off their personal habits and preferences; it also allows them to have a regular billing relationship.

In addition, operators would no longer feel the need to ‘flood’ users with unwanted and irrelevant advertising that according to a report published by Analysys in September 2007, “Destroys consumer confidence and with it the potential value of the mobile advertising market” (‘The Mobile Advertising and Marketing Revolution’, published by Analysys, September 2007). Despite advertising space within the operator portal being limited and it being a relatively new form of revenue, it does still require efficient and educated attention. Combining the navigation analysis and user behavior patterns, mapping can provide the operator with visibility to advertising area success. This might include who are the target audience, what is the click-through and success rate and identifier barriers and opportunities. This enables the operator to promote relevant advertising areas and secure the success of the advertisement itself, optimising its revenues from the limited portal advertisement space. It would also allow them to sell packages to advertisers that target specific groups.

Conclusions
The off-portal mobile market is clearly a rapidly evolving and competitive market today, giving content providers and brands a wide choice in technologies and partnerships for engaging with customers through their phones. As explained previously, off-portal can benefit not only the customer and the operator, but also help support any partners.

If the market grows in the way that mobile content markets have, it is likely that the majority of content revenues billed by network operators will be generated from the sales of off-portal content, while brands will invest in hundreds of millions of pounds of marketing to target their customers through mobile services. This is a healthy outlook for the industry. The off-portal model means that the burden of attracting phone users to mobile services can transfer from network operators – which have initiated the market – to the brands, developers and advertisers that will maintain consumer interest in mobile services over the long term, not forgetting the importance of tracking the on-portals, which still remains the consistent revenue stream for operators.

- – –

Nice one Oren, thank you for taking the time!

Sharp ready to take on China before the Olympics

Monday, March 17th, 2008

Sharp has decided to take its mobiles to pastures new. According to reports, this one from the Financial Times among them, the electronics manufacturer is planning to start selling mobiles in China in time for the Olympics later this year.

The reports say that Sharp will bring in high-end devices to the Chinese market and the company is already in talks with operators about carrying the phones, making it the only Japanese handset maker selling its wares in neighbouring China (assuming you don’t count Sony Ericsson).

It’s no surprise handset makers are all turning their attention to China – it’s been enjoying record new subscribers of late and there’s still shedloads of room to grow before saturation starts to rear its ugly head. That said, Sharp’s compatriot Kyocera recently said it was pulling out of a China, so it’s certainly not an easy market, but it is one with enthusiasm for high end devices – exactly what Sharp plans to sell.


Reactive Trades is a service from my friend, Richard Beaney
Hello to Julien Fourgeaud

The Application Review | Mobile Developer TV | Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter