<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; trade practices act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/trade_practices_act/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPhone to break Aussie laws?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/apple_iphone_to_break_aussie_laws.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/apple_iphone_to_break_aussie_laws.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade practices act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/02/apple_iphone_to_break_aussie_laws.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the iPhone was first announced, Australia has been asking &#8216;when are we going to get it?&#8217; While the country is no closer to finding out the answer to that question, it has discovered that a deal tying the device to a single operator would be illegal under the Aussie Trade Practices Act, according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the iPhone was first announced, Australia has been asking &#8216;when are we going to get it?&#8217; While the country is no closer to finding out the answer to that question, it has discovered that a deal tying the device to a single operator would be illegal under the Aussie Trade Practices Act, according to a group of legal researchers from Queensland.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Apple enter into an exclusive agreement with any particular carrier then it would be a matter for the ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) as to whether that agreement was anticompetitive and contravened the trade practices act,&#8221; <a href="http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,23272996-15306,00.html">The Australian</a> quotes one of the researchers as saying.</p>
<p>Does this mean Apple could be end of the lawsuit if it decides to launch Down Under? Possibly not, if the company uses the iPhone model of iPhone selling as a template for Australia. There, consumers can buy a handset locked to T-Mobile or they can buy an unlocked device, and pay through the nose for the privilege. I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s more than likely the same idea will be recycled when the iPhone finally does make an appearance in Oz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/apple_iphone_to_break_aussie_laws.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

