Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone?...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that...

Acision: Mobile tariffs out of step with consumer usage habits

I’m sure you’ll have read the headlines this week about consumers being royally nailed by their operators by agreeing to pay for a price plan that they don’t actually end up using. If not, here’s a bit of a refresher by way of Acision, the global messaging giant:

New research from Ofcom-accredited mobile bill analysis firm billmonitor has revealed that more than three-quarters of UK mobile subscribers are on the wrong mobile contract, wasting £4.899 billion every year (an average of £194.71 per person). The findings revealed that over half of subscribers (52%) are on too large a tariff, using on average just one quarter of their monthly calling allowance; 29% are on too small a tariff, wasting a total of £1.53 billion; finally, a further 19% have the right level of inclusive minutes but are wasting £0.74 billion by not choosing the right contract length or optimising other costs.

What’s does Acision’s top mobile billing chap Steven van Zanen think?

“The explosion in mobile data usage in the wake of the proliferation of smartphones and tablets has transformed the ways in which we use our mobile devices. Mobile social networking, gaming and video streaming are now all common activities and these in turn are affecting the costs which users are incurring. This new research is a further illustration of how existing mobile tariffs are out of step with consumers’ usage habits.”

Agreed. It is ridiculous. I know why the operators are doing it, but I think the time is fast approaching when the price plan as we know it (in terms of minutes and texts) will be obsoleted.

“As both devices and subscribers’ usage habits have become more sophisticated, the standard ‘one-size fits all approach’ to mobile charging is ineffective. Central to providing a greater level of consumer confidence in billing is giving them the power to control and manage their spend in real-time. Recent research from Acision highlighted that over 40% of consumers  would be willing to pay for notifications which would prevent out of package cost, reinforcing the consumer demand for greater control over spend. In this way, offering a charging facility which allows consumers to track their mobile spend in real-time provides operators with a unique opportunity to derive genuine competitive advantage in a fiercely contested market.”

I’m with you there Steven. But again, I can see why the operators are quite happy to just sit in silence — no news is good news, because the consumer is either over-using (in which case, they’re paying a premium) or under-using (in which case, you’re making a nice profit). Give the consumer too much clarity and you could see your profits drop quite substantially.

The other way to look at it is by giving control, as Steven asserts, you enable the consumer to choose where they spend their money. It’s then over to the operator to demonstrate value, rather than hiding everything away with obtuse billing plans. If I got a note from Vodafone to let me know when I’d hit my text message limit, or my minute bundle limit, the chances are I’d probably phone up and upgrade to the next plan. Even better, if the alert service could do it for me.

Still… dangerous talk, all this ‘innovation’.

😉

4 COMMENTS

  1. This is a timeless story. I remember it being played out by consumer groups 14 years ago, when mobile users were still in a minority. When I was at Orange the old timers who had worked on the launch told a story that they had planned a ‘price promise’ to switch people onto the best tariff for them automatically but dropped the idea when they realised how much they would be losing.

  2. This is a timeless story. I remember it being played out by consumer groups 14 years ago, when mobile users were still in a minority. When I was at Orange the old timers who had worked on the launch told a story that they had planned a ‘price promise’ to switch people onto the best tariff for them automatically but dropped the idea when they realised how much they would be losing.

  3. I’m with you Nigel. Now the ‘price promise’ is being actively muted by many
    in the operator community as a phenomenal and innovative marketing tool…
    please!

  4. I’m with you Nigel. Now the ‘price promise’ is being actively muted by many
    in the operator community as a phenomenal and innovative marketing tool…
    please!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recently Published

Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an HP LaserJet printer (version 3, if memory serves), I have been printing with an HP. Over the...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone? I'm asking because I'm thinking about what I should be doing. When I was living in Oman, I...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that next to nothing from Mobile World Congress would break through into the mainstream media. I was right,...

How Wireless Will Pave the Path to Neobank Profitability

I'm delighted to bring you an opinion piece from Rafa Plantier at Gigs.com. I think it's particularly relevant given the recent eSIM news from...

An end of an era: Vodafone UK turns off 3G services

I thought it was worthwhile highlighting this one from the Vodafone UK team. For so long - for what feels like years, seeing the...

Mobile World Congress: Did the mainstream media notice?

I resolved this year to make sure I wrote something - anything - about Mobile World Congress, the huge mobile industry trade show taking...