Posts Tagged ‘IT’

Buddycloud’s new Symbian application is out! Get it!

Friday, December 12th, 2008

I had a note in from Simon Tennant, one of the top chaps at mobile social services, Buddycloud. They’ve been innovating at a tremendous pace and Simon emailed with this update:

- - - - -

Ewan,

We don’t really do press releases but I wanted to ping you about what have been beavering away on here in Buddycloud Towers. We’re terrible at blowing our own trumpet but I figured that if we are going to talk about ourselves, then we’d rather tell you first.

This morning Ross received a newly signed build back from Symbian that rolls up all our development build goodness. Things like pushing status message to Twitter and Facebook and place syncing. eg: “Ross Savage met with Helge Timenes at Buddycloud Towers.” The chat and find-people-nearby stuff is also now looking good.

Helge has also been hard at work on our location engine, tweaking it to get even better, more accurate place bookmarks using just Cell Towers for location. And now, when a user is not at one of their place bookmarks, we share your general location with your friends (eg Ewan is on-the-road in Shorditch or Ewan is near to MIR Towers).

Helge has also been fixing some strange problems with using cellid for positioning (we discovered that all Starbucks use the same ethernet address!) The Wifi lets you be hyper-accurate but for the most part Cell Towers is “good enough”.

And I’m currently working with a university team in Munich and one in Vienna that are using our backend and handset code to develop a
carpooling and mobile dating service respectively. I’m also working with some of the standard boards to find a nice way to share location and find people nearby. Eventually we want Buddycloud, Brightkite, Fireeagle, Nokia Friendfinder etc all working together.

Some progress: A protocol we put together is now in the experimental phase
(http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html)

A couple of weeks back we asked them to help us translate the Buddycloud application to more than just English. Within 5 days we were supporting 11 languages. (Thanks gang.)

I also updated our product description page if MIR readers would like to know more about us:
http://www.buddycloud.com/cms/node/56

(trumpt blowing over) If you would like something a bit more press-releasey ping me back and I could jot something down for you.

- - - - -

STEP AWAY FROM THE PRESS RELEASE, Simon. I much prefer an email update from the chaps who’re doing it. I’m pretty sure the rest of the readers here on Mobile Industry Review prefer that too.

I’m off to go and put Buddycloud on my handset…

Here’s the link you need to download.

£175k for any UK mobile startup that wants it?

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

If only that headline was half accurate.

Mike Butcher over at TechCrunch UK has written a good overview of a £1bn investment in the tech sector announced by the UK Government at the weekend.

NESTA is the UK’s National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. And it will, reports Mike, “oversee a £1bn emergency venture capital fund aimed at pre-revenue technology start-up firms.”

On paper that sounds brilliant.

One billion quid. What a way to kick-start the economy! Give any startup that half-deserves it, 175 grand. That keeps folk paid through the downturn. That enables folk to quit their jobs in shite sectors of the economy and experiment in the new tech sectors. It keeps the money flow working — as every one of those startups needs some sort of office, some kind of office stationery, some kind of broadband service, an array of computer equipment and so on.

1 billion quid is 1,000,000,000 pounds.

So here’s how I’d do it.

You need an agency that knows what it’s doing. With good people on board to manage and distribute the funds. Those good people cost money and so do the various support people and so on.

So call that 30 million quid over 3 years. That’s your very generous overhead.

Working on the basis that we give every successful company 175k (an arbitrary sum mentioned by Mike in his piece — you can do a lot with 175k), the fund can deliver 5,542 newly funded companies.

Shocking.

OR. You could do it another way.

500 million you disperse immediately, right? That gives 175k to 2,857 companies working in the tech space. Wow.

But you’ve only spent 530 million so far.

You wait 6-12 months. Then you look at the companies that are being successful.

You then blow another 250 million on funding 500 companies with £500k each.

Wait a bit longer.

You then blow the final 220 million on funding 220 companies with £1m each.

Come on!

It’d be like turning the UK tech industry into a glorified Y-Combinator.

But you and I know it’d never actually happen.

It’s far too entrepreneurial, far too ‘big’, far too ‘real’, far too ’sensible’ for the United Kingdom.

Mike is hoping that, should this fund go-ahead, it should, “Avoid, at all costs, allocating this cash to regional funds administered by pen-pushing civil servants, the woeful Business Links and local authorities.”

Yup. They’re more or less all bollocks. I’ve been right there on the coalface many-a-time when I’ve been looking for finance and assistance and I can comprehensively say they’re more or less useless.

I suspect that the NESTA announcement is simply that.

An announcement. No substance.

I’d be delighted if something came of it. But, again, as Mike pointed out, the ‘announcement’ was made in the Sunday Papers. Which is where policies are floated here in the UK. They’re floated. We all nod thinking ‘what a good idea’ (or ‘what tosh’, depending on the subject) and we go about our day a little happier.

And then 6 months pass. And some bright spark around the table at some event will say, ‘Yes, but what about that billion quid that ‘they’ were going to invest?’

And no one can quite remember what happened or who ‘they’ were.

And we move on.

So, taking a billion quid and sticking it into the UK tech sector would be a phenomenal, phenomenal investment in the country’s future. The attention, the excitement, the additional funds that would be drawn to the UK as a result — well that’s all far too exciting to consider closely.

We move on.

NEXT.

IT Professor rubbishes texting as an emergency alert system

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

Now this is an interesting one. A very interesting one. You know how I’m all in favour of text systems for emergency or company/organisation-wide alerts?

Well, that’s based on the system actually working as expected. The ability to be able to send a message to all 5,000 staff immediately (e.g. “Hello, come and empty your desk please, Mr & Mrs Lehman Brothers”) can only be a good thing, surely?

But as we’ve reported before, some systems haven’t entirely worked when they’ve been tested. Witness, if you will, the Louisiana State University text system screwing up during a test.

There are obvious implications here for the companies that have grown up specialising in emergency text services for colleges, universities and organisations.

The research by this Computer Science Professor is pretty direct. And it’s not the service providers to blame per se — it’s the actual operator infrastructure that is, typically, simply not built to send 10,000 messages through one or two cellular masts in one location, immediately.

The research conducted for the paper indicates that there are serious limitations in third party Emergency Alert Systems (EAS). In particular, because of the general architecture of CDMA, TDMA and GSM cellular networks, such systems will not be able to deliver a high volume of emergency messages in a short period of time. Through discussion, modeling and simulation, Traynor demonstrated in the paper that current systems not only cannot widely disseminate such messages quickly, but also that the additional traffic created by third party EAS solutions may disrupt other traffic such as voice communications, including that of emergency responders or the public to 9-1-1 services.

Cellular News has the full story.


. PercentMobile Tracking