Posts Tagged ‘Mr Operator’

Mr Operator’s upcoming 2,500 word WiMax ‘viewpoint’

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

The weekly newsletter subscribers will get the first 5 paragraphs of Mr Operator’s WiMax discourse early this afternoon.

His piece will go live here later in the day.

If you’ve ever wondered about WiMax and whether it’s any good, you’ll want to look at Mr Operator’s take. I don’t think I’m giving anything away when I say he’s not exactly a big fan — this is, perhaps, predictable — given that WiMax is mentioned (in some circles) as heralding the death of the operator as we know it.

And it doesn’t look that much of a stretch, does it? Not when you can walk the length of the City of London (“the square mile”) connected to The Cloud’s WiFi network?

Prepare for a learned discourse.

Oh and we’ll have a podcast of it up shortly too.

Sign-up to the newsletter here, by the way:

If you’re not getting the newsletter — and you’re signed-up — do talk to Krystal and she’ll sort it.

Mr Operator’s WiMax discourse in tomorrow’s newsletter

Monday, September 1st, 2008

You can get a preview in full of Mr Operator’s WiMAX discourse in tomorrow’s newsletter.

If you haven’t signed-up already, here’s the form you need:

If you’re not getting the newsletter — and you’re signed-up — do talk to Krystal and she’ll sort it.

WiMax discourse from Mr Operator coming shortly

Monday, September 1st, 2008

We’ve a huge, huge piece on WiMax coming from Mr Operator. Suffice to say, he is not impressed.

Some highlights I plucked from his piece this morning:

  • “Over at Intel, someone else (possibly at the same long lunch) piped up and said “Great idea guys, here’s several Billion dollars, hop to it”. And lo, the WiMax hype machine was born.”
  • “But there’s a rather pesky technical fly in the WiMax salesman’s snakeoil.”
  • “Moving on to the myth that WiMax provides better ‘coverage’ than 3G systems.”
  • “And at currently allocated frequencies, you’ll be building 3-4 times the number of sites.”

We’re aiming to publish on Tuesday.

There’s gonna be fireworks.

Mr Operator: How do I get my handset into an operator?

Tuesday, August 26th, 2008

After my call for questions for Mr Operator, I had one in today:

Question:

What does it take for a smaller handset manufacturer to get ‘into’ the operator stores? Aren’t consumers bored of Nokia or SonyEricsson (like you are Ewan)? Or is it all based on size and rebates and not on market innovation?

A bit of disclosure – I work for UK handset manufacturer Onyx, who launched the Liscio and have other handsets in the pipeline.

I’d be really interested to hear what Mr Operator has to say.

Thanks for taking the time and for being brave there, Mr Reader. I sent this over to Mr Operator who had a bit of time this evening to answer.

Now over to Mr Operator:

- – - – -

Volume. Volume. Volume.

Background:

An MNO is not a Vertu stockist. They simply cannot afford to have stock sitting round, gathering dust. Every day teams agonise over the mix of devices, OS, colours, etc, fine-tuning their offerings to best meet their target markets.

Behind the scenes there’s a hell of a lot of work to support a new device, even one from a major vendor on a stable, long-standing OS like S40. The logistics of bringing a new handset to market is measured in the millions of dollars/pounds/euros. The marketing collateral, the call centre training, the in-store fitout, the distribution, returns and repair process.

Pushing a machine of this size and complexity in a new direction is not easy.

If you look at a pretty average MNO, say with 5 million customers in a country, they will typically range about 15-20 handsets. Maybe more, maybe less, but the volume tail falls away rapidly beyond the 20 mark. With customers updating handsets every 18-24 months, that means they go through around say 2 million handsets a year. Bring that down across the range and you’re looking at around 100k per model. Of course, the low-to-mid tier S40 devices from Nokia currently have the lion’s share of this, so maybe they are up around the 500k mark, with top-end music & business devices much smaller, say 20-30k each. But you get the idea.

Any way you slice it, you are looking at big numbers. With an average price of say US$150 for a mainstream S40 device, that’s around $15 million up-front hardware cost *minimum* to range an average device. Plus your previously-mentioned internal costs – which have to be factored in for cross-department charging purposes.

So you can see why MNO’s sweat the details on a new handset. Why everything, from the colour and shape of the icons to the tactile feel of the surface to the unboxing process to the boot-up screen must be as good as possible, to convey to the customer a nice experience. You want zero returns. Returns cost big bucks – especially if you can’t pass it back to the vendor.

If you are being asked to take a punt on a new device, a new brand, maybe even a new OS, you have to either have a contract chiseled in stone or the vendor’s children in a vault that it will sell. Otherwise you are asking the MNO marketing department to place their collective necks on the block and hope that the customers like these new, unheard-of devices enough to pay off the axeman.

Sometimes MNO’s do this themselves, for example the Huawei-made Vodafone-branded value range, or Hutchison’s Amoi-built Skypephone. These are long-term plays, where the MNO has complete control over the experience, and the devices are dirt cheap, built for voice’n'text with a comparatively low-spec camera etc. You won’t see these going head-to-head with the N-Series or Walkmans.

And then there’s the customer’s dogged loyalty to an OS, once they get used to the look & feel. Many customers are ‘Nokia people’ or ‘Sony people’. They don’t like change, unless it’s a really compelling sell on price or features. So no, customers aren’t ‘bored’, just they can’t be arsed learning something new.

The answer:

For a small vendor to get into the MNO stores, they need a design, a concept, an implementation that so utterly blows away the top 5, at a price and contract T’s & C’s that it is a no-brainer. I’ve never seen one yet, but would love to. We are talking almost iPhone-style differentiation. A twisting of the cube that redefines what a mobile should be.

The question is, if you came up with such a thing why go through the pain of making it yourself? Why not license it to one of the big 5, kick back and rake in the royalties?

It is literally the case that a vendor sometimes cannot give away devices to MNO’s, if the fit isn’t right. The saved CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) in not forking out $150 to buy the device may well be wiped out by the amount of customer bad will and brand damage a shoddy device could generate.

This is why, across over 700 GSM MNO’s, with many billions of customers, you see the same handset vendors and the same devices over and over again. I doubt any other consumer device industry is so dominated by such a small number of players. Basic economics tells us if there’s money on the table someone will grab it. In the mobile handset world, Apple recently said “Sod this”, built their own table and have done well in their chosen space. But with a market valuation eclipsing Google and enough spare cash to buy quite a few countries, they can afford to take some hits.

Not so your average MNO or small-scale handset vendor. Hence why the foil to risk inherent in innovating needs to come from within MNO’s, in response to a business plan. Vodafone & Hutchison have probably taken losses to get their bespoke devices to market, but that will be in the plan. But you don’t foil risk with a shiny sales pitch up against the sheer mass of the big 5, the customers brand loyalty and the marketing manager’s desire to keep her bonus & job.

Not that it should be doom & gloom on the micro-vendor front. Far from it. Look at the market for bespoke cars. Or beer. Or watches. There are a significant enough number of people who value something different, something special. Most are happy with a Mondeo, but a small number want a Morgan. Horses for courses. Just don’t expect to see loads of Morgans outside your local Sainsbury’s any time soon.

- – - – -

Thank you Mr Operator!

If you’d like to put a question to Mr Operator, drop it in an email to me, subject ‘Mr Operator’. You can ask anything. Big theme, small curiosity. Has there been a question that’s been burning in the back of your mind? Get it answered.

Mr Operator is going to do his best to answer all questions. It might take a few days or a week or so depending on his work commitments. Try him out?

Send me your questions for Mr Operator!

Tuesday, August 26th, 2008

I’ve been on to Mr Operator today with the feedback from my earlier post. Thank you for that.

I’ve agreed that, generally, we won’t be pulling any punches. We’ll be punching away. Or, at least, Mr Operator will be.

I’ve taken off the mask, the 10cm thick iron chains and the straitjacket.

Mr Operator is now waiting for your input. He will answer any question you care to put to him (provided it’s authored by someone with half a brain). I expect that sometimes, he might respond with a single sentence. Other times, you might get an essay.

Let’s take a step back first though. Who is Mr Operator? Here’s the original text I published when we launched the series:

There’s a chap I know. I’ve been calling him The Operator or Mr Operator in the recent SMS Text News Mobile Industry Review podcasts. He’s a little known gem that almost every mobile startup needs to talk with. Or, ideally, hire. Indeed, if you’re not talking to him at the moment, or if you’ve never heard of this service, talk to me and I’ll see if I can introduce you. He consults to a maximum of five mobile startups at any one time. His job? To rip their services to pieces. To rubbish every slide, to bludgeon the startup’s business plan. To slap the VC sitting on the startup board. To bring reality. Yes! His job is to help you craft a winning strategy to pitch a mobile operator.

How do you know he’s any good? Simple. He is that man. He’s the guy you pitch at one of the world’s largest international operators. Hardly a week goes by where he doesn’t send me a text privately ridiculing yet another high profile startup that’s just been sent marching, tail between their legs, from his office. He does the best he can to help smooth rough diamonds but, geez, the stories he tells me. He doesn’t ridicule them for spite. It’s frustration. He’s hugely frustrated with the total lack of understanding displayed by most entrepreneurs trying to do business with operators.

Here’s what I’m looking for: I’m looking for questions. Anything you’d like to know. Send me your questions with the subject Mr Operator and I’ll get him to answer.

You might like to know what revenue splits an operator implements with content providers. How to get on deck. Who runs their deck? How do you sell them an handset? How do you put a service on a handset?

Whatever your question — or set of questions — whack them to me and let’s get moving.

As ever, I’m ewan@mobileindustryreview.com.

How now, Mr Operator? Fare ye well?

Monday, August 25th, 2008

It’s been a while since we’ve heard from Mr Operator, isn’t it?   Our mystical high profile executive working at one of the world’s biggest international operators was on a roll.  It was fabulously well received.

That’s until we solicited enquiries for companies to be reviewed.

We got one or two out the door but the vast majority of them, Mr Operator briefly reviewed then wrote back to me saying, ‘Er, if I do a piece on [Company X], it will most likely put the shits up their investors and hamstring them on-going.’

Which isn’t something we’re into, here at Mobile Industry Review.

We’ve got a lot of analysts, investors and venture capitalists reading regularly and, well… if you look at how brutal Mr Operator could be… that might not be good news for a lot of companies.

The idea behind the concept with the series of features was to let people know what sort of things an operator is looking for — so that you avoid making mistake-after-mistake when you’re trying to deal with one.  But then I happened upon the idea of offering companies the ability to pitch Mr Operator and then publish both the pitch and his perspective.

I’m in two minds and I’d appreciate your perspective.  Would you like to read a direct, critical-in-some-places evaluation of mobile companies, from the perspective of Mr Operator?

Or should we do a Q&A style set of features?  You send me your questions for him and I’ll get him to respond?

I’d appreciate your viewpoints — either by mail or here in the comments.

Mr Operator: Developers are out of date

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Mr Operator

In a recent conversation on SMS Text News regarding the future of the mobile industry – and in particular where applications and clients were headed – the point was put that “The operators have spent so much money that I just can’t see them letting go very much.

I beg to differ. We are ‘letting go’, in the form of increasingly flat-rate data plans. We see month-on-month growth of data plan sales that eclipses ANYTHING seen previously. Our Mobile Broadband product managers have huge grins, thinking of bonus time. Our network planners sweat buckets and pray to the gods of modulation to deliver them from congestion.

If ‘letting go’ means ‘welcoming thousands of app developers with open arms’ then we must sadly disagree. Many developers see this as something the MNO’s *MUST* do. I posit that we *CAN’T* do it. We simply don’t have the teams in place, or the business model to support said teams. In the age of niche, of the long tail, you cannot dedicate staff to managing a product that only appeals to a small base. You have limited marketing resource. Limited ability to put apps / links on portal / screen. We CANNOT put our brand behind it, and agree to full customer support for it, because the cost of training everyone in the organisation is prohibitive.

So the future as I see it is many niche apps (encompassing clients and web apps) that customers can access via their open, flat-rate device, from ’stores’ or from ‘Sources’ a la iPhone Installer. There is a widely-held belief that user-installed apps are dead (were they ever ‘alive’ to the masses?), they are too hard for most people to use. This is a viewpoint spawned by the currently appalling experience – to a non-geek – of installing apps on Symbian handsets. Quite rightly MNO’s are loathe to promote something that we know will be a customer-unfriendly experience to install & configure.

But there is light at the end of the application tunnel. The amazing success of FaceBook Apps (indeed, what is FaceBook without apps?) and the ease of adding them, connecting them to other services like Flickr, Dopplr, ShoZu, should give us hope. Hope that customers will discover and ‘install’ applications if they a) see the benefit of doing so and b) are not scared of breaking their device. Mobile phone apps need to be as easy to install as FaceBook apps. Get the OS out of the way and watch the public lap them up. The jailbroken iPhone gave us a taste of this, although by dint of being jailbroken you are immediately looking at someone pretty comfortable messing with the innards of a phone.

The beauty of the iPhone App store model is that you as an O2 iphone user can pay to download an app, and if it goes belly-up you will take umbrage with the Apps store and the developer, not with O2. This is the first time mobile consumers have been exposed en masse to the PC model of application purchase and – critically – support. You don’t call BT when your Skype client goes on the fritz (well, after ascertaining that everything else is working OK). No, you grumble to Skype, maybe reinstall it, maybe visit Skype’s help forums. For the mobile industry this is a paradigm shift.

MNO’s will continue to hunt for key differentiators – apps to pre-install on handsets and fully support. These exclusive deals with major names or really top-notch startups who pass muster will continue to happen. MNO’s will continue to pay product managers and marketing departments to manage and promote the eBays, Skypes, BeBo’s, Monilinks, MusicStations, etc etc. But these deals will be – literally – one in ten thousand.

There will always be users who are way beyond the curve, who can walk into a store and know far more about the devices and apps than the worker bees. These people will always grumble that MNO’s are too restrictive, too slow, too afraid. Some MNO’s are. People are like that, and people run MNO’s. Our customers are like that too. It’ a gradual change happening, kicked off 18 months ago by T-Mobile & 3, kicked in the pants by the iPhone a year ago and no doubt again this Friday. The public are slowly learning what’s possible and what to expect. It’s gathering pace. The enablers are lining up, heads are getting around what is possible, what works, what doesn’t. We are Letting Go, and in doing so everyone will win.

Developers need to evolve along with the MNO’s and customers. Some will be wildly successful, most won’t be. The ones with viral apps, that hook into un-mobilised communities, enabling them to engage in their passions instead of just being another ‘me too’ IM or MoSoSo tool, they will succeed. The Great British Gardening app will rise, I’m sure.

Mr Operator on 4G: Don’t wind me up

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

This week Mr Operator is looking at 4G. Don’t get too excited though, for us here in the West, it’s years away…

- – - – -

Sometimes you just can’t win.

Spend quite a few Billion to deploy 3G – It’s not fast enough. OK, spend a few hundred million and a few years, deploy 3.5G HSPA, now it’s just fast enough. Until next year, when we (according to the media) demand actual Megabit speeds and sub-20ms latency so we can play games and use VoIP apps to bypass your voice charging mechanism.

Is the customer always right? Does keeping the customer happy make business sense?

Sometimes, no.

The Return On Investment cycle for MNO’s is measured in decades.

Remember the lovely Nokia 7110? The one Keanu Reeves used in the first Matrix movie? How cool was that keypad slide? Well, a mobile site built back when that was hot has only just paid for itself now.

So, you ask your investor for 10Bn over 10 years, buy a licence, build a network, spend a fortune on marketing acquiring customers, wait for EBITDA to become positive (nervous smiles all round chaps) and then actually make some cash/pay some dividends in the last few years, before having to do it all over again, because customers now want the Next Big Thing. In this case, uber-fast low-latency pervasive mobile broadband.

So when an article like this from the FT says that 4G will be available ‘for commercial deployment’ next year, the grain of salt required arrives courtesy of one of these.

A starter on 4G: it doesn’t exist yet.

There is speculation, talk and argument, even some prototype lab stuff going on. But all we really do know is that it will use advanced radio wizardry known as OFDM. We are a few years away from standards-body agreement on exactly what 4G is. Then another year away from hardware MNO’s can test on. And then – most importantly – place a purchase order for. That’s when the rubber hits the MNO road. That’s when line managers in the RF & deployment departments budget time for deployment. Budget for increased backhaul (rather a large issue in itself).

4G has a number of thorny issues to deal with, like IPR. When you buy a 4G network, who do you pay rights to? This is currently as clear as mud, despite recent IPR pool developments. Not for nothing did Qualcomm buy Flarion, the recognised OFDM IPR leader.

Then there’s spectrum slices. Is it 20MHz? 5MHz? 1.25MHz? all of the above? customisable? When your 3G licence runs for another 10 years in clearly-defined 5MHz blocks(in the case of UMTS 3G), you have to work with what you’ve got.

Now about all of this tosh the customer cares not a jot.

What they want is to be sold something fast, that they can use anywhere, while mobile or stationary. HSPA meets this need now, although it does depend on your definition of ‘fast’. Is HSPA ‘fast enough’ for what most people want – web browsing & email/IM? I’d argue yes.

Customers don’t want to have multiple networks if they can avoid them. WiMax will not meet customer expectations of voice for quite some time, if ever, and WiMax MNO’s will still have to pay voice and IP traffic interconnection/termination fees, which will be passed onto customers. And don’t suggest that people will use dedicated VoIP clients to communicate – will you ask your mum to install a VoIP client on her PC so you can save a few quid calling her? Please. (and no, Skype is not the answer. Show me they are profitable. Go on.) So that leaves WiMax as just a mobile broadband play. Is WiMax’s lunch already eaten by the HSPA dongle bully? I’d say yes.
And if it’s ‘commercial’ next year, where are the handsets / dongles? MNO device roadmaps are 12-month affairs, so if things are going to be ‘commercial’ in 2009, we should see LTE/WiMax devices cropping up on them now.

:: cut to handset procurement team meeting ::

“So guys, where are the LTE units we wanted?”

:: crickets chirp ::
:: tumbleweed ::

Of course, none of this will prevent Intel pouring a lot of cash into the idea of WiMax now, and VC’s backing WiMax network startups. When the inevitable happens you can bet that MNO’s will be eyeing the WiMax carcasses eagerly, looking for some cheap infrastructure & licences to integrate into their LTE networks.

So long-term, things are looking good for consumers. Things are getting faster. HSPA+ promises some good speed bumps. Networks will evolve, backhaul will improve. These are inevitable, incremental improvements.

But 100MBps to your handset next year? Don’t wind me up.

- – - – -

You can find out more about Mr Operator here.


Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter