Posts Tagged ‘phones’

Orange offering Blackberry on Pay As You Go

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Thanks to Mobile Industry Review reader Hazy who dropped me a note about Orange doing a bit of innovation.

I know it’s hard to believe.

Very hard.

If you screw your eyes up really tightly and look at the Orange brand whilst tapping your heels together 3 times, the company does look pretty innovative.

But in the cold light of day, your average Orange experience is typically of damp-squid proportions.

This news, however, goes some way toward changing that viewpoint though: You can get a Blackberry from Orange on Pay As You Go.

Interesting.

Very interesting indeed.

Here’s a screenshot:

No details on prices yet. I wonder if they’ll be able to knock out the Pearl for less than £99?

Mobile phones get a 52-inch widescreen TV

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008
AV230XL

AV230XL


We were at a lunch and the launch last week of the new personal video Vuzix iWear products, the OLED based AV230XL and the widescreen AV310. Effectively turning your mobile device into a 44-inch and 52-inch screen, respectively, and as if my magic. Tadarr!

These two new models update their range to offer their first, and the actual very first fully, 16:9 widescreen viewable headset in addition to the first OLED display too.

Fitting like a normal pair of glasses, if not a tad bulkier than normal but not uncomfortable, they connect to a mobile source and deliver an image to the onboard screen. If we do say so ourselves, it’s a rather cool and funky accessory to any mobile.

Although the AV230XL isn’t widescreen it makes up for it by offering the OLED display, whilst replicating a 44-inch screen. We were told on the day that a widescreen version is around 18 months away, seeing as they’ve only just introduced this tech in to their range.

As for the AV310, it is widescreen but doesn’t have a stunning image like the V230XL glasses – it’s still quite something to behold. It offers up a 52-inch screen as if viewed from 9 feet away, with Stereo 3D capable headphones.

Both of these new products have connectors for devices with TV Out such as Nokia, Sony Ericsson, LG, Samsung and HTC. It’s here for our dollars worth they really gain their usefulness. The sets are even bundled with an approved “Made for iPod” cable, besides leads for the likes of the Nokia N96 and N96.

Less not forget other devices such as Apple iPod range, MP4 players and games consoles like Wii. All of which are supported.

The usual retailers have them in stock: Firebox.com, Play.com, Applestore.com, Amazon.com or direct from www.vuzix.co.uk.

The AV230XL pitches up £129.99, whilst the AV310 Widescreen comes along at £149.99.

Having tried these out for a while, they do show off their usefulness and deliver a sharp image. What better way to get away from the family at Christmas, stick a movie on the phone and sit back whilst the arguments ensue all around you.

See more on the AV230XL and AV310 here and here

Mobile Networks Youll never cease to amaze me!

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

Im being serious here. Since my time here as Mobile Industry Review Ive read hundreds of news articles on the latest goings on with the mobile industry. Yes a lot of the so called news is terribly boring, but every now and then, I have to sit back laugh, and ask why?

Ricky kindly sent me over a link to a piece of why news; O2 who recently stopped subsidising their top end phones, have decided to subsidise them again! Well, at least on two phones, the Samsung Tocco and Sony C902.

The Samsung Tocco, Sony C902 and Nokia N95 were all raised to a 75-per-month tariff, but only the Tocco and C902 have been reduced. They are now subsidised on a 35 tariff.

Amazingly O2 have decided against subsidising the Nokia N95, and as Ricky mentioned to me Couldnt this cause a stir between the giant manufacturer and the mobile network? Maybe even Nokia penalising O2 by not giving them exclusive launches or something dramatic along those lines.

Personally, I dont quite understand what O2 were trying to achieve with this, yes okay, they were hoping that other networks were going to follow suit; but who in their business-thinking-right-mind would make existing and/or potential customers pay more in the current credit climate?

Vodafone made me question them the other week too, with their higher prices theyve introduced. They may be trying to make money here, but surely out-pricing yourself from the high-street competition isnt the best way to do it, is it?

As for Nokia and O2, whats going to happen here! I fear O2 are making some risky moves here, which I seriously doubt will pay off; and if Ricky has guessed correctly, this could affect them in the future too.

I wonder what they will do next!

Mobile phones leading to fairer African elections

Monday, August 25th, 2008

CNN are are reporting that mobile phones are helping keep voting and vote counting in check — through independent communication. In the piece, Mike Steere gives an example of journalists being able to use their mobile handsets to call their radio/TV stations to independently verify that voting is proceeding as expected.

The impact of the medium of mobile is, in these types of situation, phenomenal.

Fantastic. There’s a lot more to read in Mike’s piece.

Mobile phones and eight year olds.

Friday, August 1st, 2008

When I walked to school everyday, I used to be mildly horrified at the young children who walked past me with mobile phones. Im not talking about eleven year olds, Im talking about proper Primary School aged children; eight year olds or younger.

My cousin is one of those children who had a mobile at an extremely young age; I think she was eight or nine. And I always wondered why at that age does a child require a mobile phone? What possible need is there for one?

Well, obviously there isnt. At that age youre not off out on your own, and you certainly do not have a social life that requires constant access to the world.

What causes this desire is peer pressure, and idolising characters out of Hannah Montana, or whatever its called; and I think its wrong.

Ill admit now, I got my first mobile when I was eleven, and even that was a struggle. But it was more for practicality than anything else; I would be starting high school, and gradually gaining more freedom. For a long time, my only contacts were my Mum and home number.

Then there is my cousin, who has just turned eleven, on to her second mobile, with dozens of contacts. All of her friends have mobiles too, and they have done from a similar age; but to all of their parents it seems perfectly fine.

Maybe this is me just showing my grannyish side, which I know I definitely have, but does no one else see any wrong in this?

Children are, as their name suggests, children. A mobile is not just a device to contact other people; its a responsibility, a liability, and maybe even a health hazard. The liability comes in the form of the increasing numbers of teenagers having their mobile phones stolen, and whos to say that these young children are not at equal, or even greater threat?

The health side-effects are yet undetermined with mobile phones, and surely, dont want to be exposing their young children to possibly dangerous electro-magnetic energies right? No, wrong, they do. They go out, spend money on mobiles, and not just the cheapest ones out of Woolworths, but camera phones, or walkman phones, for their deprived children.

This is by no means a new occurrence; I remember when I was around eight or seven myself, and a couple of girls in my year had mobile phones. At the time, most of us, were amazed at the sight, I mean, mobiles in the nineties, they were generally reserved for adults, the business, and important people of the world; and I saw my peers with them. But at that age, it was never necessary, most of the day is spent in school, and when youre outside of School, youre rarely fifty meters away from your parents sight.

I am by no means a parent, or anything of the sort; but it worries and shocks me to see such young children trying to grow up so quickly, but more so, the parents. I wouldnt say giving eight year olds mobile phones is practical or necessary; and if anything the children are more prone to be in danger.

What do you think? Should young children have mobile phones? And is there any way to stop such young hands owning devices which could have adverse affects on them? Also, is this another sign that childhood is becoming extinct?

Feel free to e-mail me any thoughts too at samantha@smstextnews.com

Just what we need in the 02 store – bored celebs on phones

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

You know how it is. You’re a marketing manager and sick to the back teeth with your company’s advertising. The only adverts they ever put out are celebrity “I use this” posters for shops and the odd advert.

Lets face it, it wasn’t the best of jobs. Kimi Rikknen seemed a tad dull. Michael Schumacher made you want to smack something. Steffi Graff was the best of the bunch but even then you often found yourself planning shopping lists as you were talking to them.

In fact, the only perk is that you got VIP treatment at the British Grand Prix.

So, what do you do for a nice change? You suggest they make a phone instead.

Tag Heuer, the watch company with adverts of sports stars looking unhappy whilst wearing one, has had its first phone unveiled through the FCC.

It should be said that I do like Tags. They’re very beautiful, but also very out of my price range. So it should come as no surprise that the phone lives up to this. It is stunning, sleek, silver and 3000.

Yes, I did just say 3000. Just to make that clear, three thousand.

So, what do you get for this?

Ummm, a sapphire coating that makes it scratch-proof. A media player. A 2mp camera. Did I mention a sapphire coating?

The Meridiist is clearly for the fashion conscious and, no doubt, it will soon be seen in the hands of F1 drivers. But only those that win – of course.

Stop with the pink, please.

Friday, July 25th, 2008

Pink. A colour for the females apparently, and one, which according to many female gadget/technology orientated websites, feel like they have to ambush my eyes with! And to be honest, Ive had enough.

Its bad enough that quite a few technology/gadgetry websites and even magazines insist on having half-naked women plastered all over them. Im not trying to unravel the mysteries of the male mind here, but what ever happened to not being able to multi-task?

Well, over the past couple of days Ive been visiting, and revisiting a number of websites for gadgetry news and the like, and particularly feminine ones, just so I can see what the different views and news are. But on all the girly ones (which are hard enough to come by), they all have this will to impose pink on me. Then the news section is made up of look, a Louis Vuitton case for your iPhone! Why does everyone presume the female kind to be so shallow?

Now, I know Im not exactly talking about mobiles here, but the same thing applies. I rarely read Heat, Closer, or any of that other rubbish which tries to qualify itself as news, and interesting. But, when I do, Im always annoyed. There will be at least one mobile advert (normally), and it angers me.

Ill give you three guesses the colour of the phone?

I dont even have to say the answer; I know you know it already. Sometimes though, us female kind are also given the choice of purple or baby blue to enlighten our eyes too; that though is still just as bad.

Its also the technology in such phones that annoys me. I know there is at least one exception to this rule, and that would probably be the pink the Blackberry; but all the others are to put it mildly, crap.

Ive been into the Carphone Warehouse and Phones4U quite a lot over the past couple of months. I needed a new phone, and I wanted something that was technological, within my budget, and comfortable for me. The sales staff in these shops always ask, What phone do you have, and at the time it was a D600 shock horror face – thats a male phone; you cant have that, lets find you a nice girly one. So I go along with this idea, and I get old Motorolas, or pink Samsungs flung my way. Then, dare I ask, What about a phone that has a good camera, and some interest going on within it But those are male phones, youre a girl, stick to girl phones.

Ill admit some mobiles are a bit too blokey if you get my sense. But still, why does half of the population have to be deprived of quality news, and mobiles, because of this stupidity.

I say its stupid because it could be easily solved if more females were heading the campaign companies, and the mobile companies. Instead there are a bunch of middle-aged males, who think that making a phone in a pink version is enough to sell it to the female market. Im telling you now, youre wrong.

Not every female likes pink, and Im the first to put my hands up to this, I hate the colour. There are some who do like pink, and Im also sure there are some who are happy with their limited choice in over priced mobile telecommunications; but Im not.

Im not going to pretend I have all the answers here, and so Im not going to offer any ideas or suggestions. I want the mobile companies to do that. Next year I want to be surprised by the innovation in the mobile industry, mobile phones that are equally likeable to male and females, and ones which maybe are specifically gender orientated, but dont use pink to highlight this.

Nokia: There may be trouble ahead

Friday, April 18th, 2008

Interesting results out of Nokia this week: despite some promising numbers, like net sales up 28 percent year on year and device volumes up around about the same, it looks like the money men weren’t impressed by the results. Why? Nokia’s warning things won’t always be as rosy.

“Nokia expects the mobile device market to decline in value in Euro terms in 2008, compared to 2007. The change from our previous estimate of value growth for this market primarily reflects the negative impact of the recently weakened US dollar, the general economic slowdown in the US, and possibly going forward some economic slowdown in Europe,” the company said, and added that average selling price is expected to go down too.

There’s also discussions on how rising food prices will affect Nokia’s performance in emerging markets. According to Business Week, Nokia’s CEO said the chance there will be a knock on effect is “pretty remote. The mobile phone is a necessity item”. That sounds somewhat on the optimistic side to me, unless Nokia’s next line comes with Bluetooth, a two megapixel camera and a few loaves of free bread.


Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter