Posts Tagged ‘SMS’

141,000 reasons why the UK mobile industry is nailed

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

I got the PhonePayPlus (the British Premium Rate regulator) newsletter in this morning.

More dire reading.

Another 141,000 pounds worth of fines.

Here is just one sample of the ‘breaches upheld’ (or the areas of issue) for one company:

Adequate Technical Quality, Fairness (Misleading), Inappropriate Promotion, Subscription Reminders

Is this still where everyone’s making real cash? Misleading and unfair trickery?

Text the school nurse for a morning-after pill

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

The morning-after emergency contraceptive pill is to be made available to schoolgirls at six schools in Oxfordshire here in the UK. And the medium of request is text messaging.

If you’ve been having a bit of jiggery-pokery and you think the contraception might have failed; or if you didn’t bother and you’re in a blind panic, you can now text the nurse and ask for one.

Whatever your perspective on teenagers, sex and the easy availability of contraception, this is super news in the context of the SMS medium — it’s absolutely perfect for this type of communication.

You can read more here.

Will SMS ever become mainstream for small business?

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I got a reminder yesterday from my dental practice.

By text message.

Here’s how it read:

Ewan, this is just a reminder that you have an appointment tomorrow at 10am. [insert name of practice]

Good service, no?

Aye.

I was very impressed. They’d obviously taken my phone number and decided to follow up with a text. We’re all sold on the concept of text reminders, I hope.

We’re all, I hope, feeling a bit of private satisfaction on behalf of the mobile industry as a result. Isn’t it good to see the local dentist adopting the medium? It’s finally MAINSTREAM!

Well, no.

Here’s the problem.

The surgery’s secretary types each message out by hand. On a rubbish 5 year old Pay-As-You-Go handset that must have belonged to the dentist originally.

This is their business critical infrastructure.

I’ve seen the poor lady typing out the messages. Every single one is custom typed! The phone numbers are stored in a paper-based diary.

Goodness me.

The moment I discovered this I felt a huge stab of mental pain.

What’s the problem here? Why haven’t they got some-kind-of-system to do this for them?

Well, for one thing, they’re still stuck on a paper-based calendar for the booking and management of appointments. So there’s no easy way to automate.

And there’s no desktop on their desktop. No web browser to use the array of desktop text alert services that I could list out. There’s quite a lot of barriers. You need a desktop machine, you need the practice to be computerised, you need a plugin text service, you need the secretaries to be trained…

How depressing.

Still, it’s good to see the medium getting a bit of use.

One final point. A lot of these text systems that you see nowadays — for example if you’re getting your haircut, some of those systems have automated text messages — a lot of them have no reply function. They’re simply broadcast messages with no return-ID set. So you can’t reply at all.

I do actually quite like the fact that this poor secretary has had to hand-type the message to me… because if I need to change my appointment, I know I can reply and that she will see it.

Now and again if I’ve had time, I’ve actually written back and said thank you whenever I’ve had a reminder.

+49 German inbound SMS numbers launched by TynTec

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

If you’ve been hunting for a German version of the ubiquitous +44 UK long numbers, consider taking a look at TynTec’s latest offering. They’ve launched the 12-digit phone numbers today — to join their UK and Finnish offerings.

‘Long numbers’ (i.e. numbers that look like normal mobile phone numbers, but usually only receive SMS) are really, really useful when you don’t want the hassle of a shortcode. I’ve been using them for years here in the UK for an array of different services that I dreamt up.

I most recently built a private Twitter-style SMS system for a client using some UK inbound numbers. Love it.

You can find TynTec’s offering here.

(By the way, we’ve got a video of TynTec’s top chap, Michael Kowalzik, that we filmed at Mobile World Congress. It’s coming soon along with all the other footage!)

iTAGG’s numbers now earn 0.5 pence on inbound texts

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Interesting news from Steve at UK mobile services firm, iTAGG.

Check this out:

- - - - -

Hi Ewan

Hope you’re well and enjoyed Barcelona. I’ll be at Cebit next week so lets meet if you are going too. Thought you would like a world exclusive from iTAGG…..

iTAGG’s Dedicated Virtual SMS Numbers (e.g. +447797800300) are about to become revenue sharing. Clients can earn upto half a penny on every incoming SMS from mobiles in the UK, most of Europe and South Africa. To confirm, this is nothing to do with reverse billed sms, this is purely on inbound messages. To celebrate this unique offering in the UK text messaging industry, we are also lowering the standard price of each dedicated number to just £99+vat per year (£199 for gold vanity numbers). This deal is so hot off the plate that we haven’t even finished the promotional web page yet, so please email steveprocter (at) itagg.com for further details.

I would also like to extend the following deal to all Mobile Industry Review readers (for orders before end of March)…

- unlimited numbers for £60 each per year, including gold vanity numbers
- skip the tiered payouts and go straight to the £0.005 payout per incoming, no matter how small or big your volume

Enjoy…..

regards
Steve

- - - - - -

This kind of revenue share offering is — as Steve points out — nothing to do with reverse billing. It’s been possible to generate revenue (say half a penny or even a penny) per text with shortcodes for some time. It’s this sort of thing that I thought the likes of Twitter could have used to at least generate some kind of incoming revenue.

More from iTAGG at www.itagg.com.

UK snowfall sends AQL traffic up 5x this morning

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

I just heard from Fliss over at messaging service provider — and regular MIR advertiser — AQL. The saw their traffic hit 300,000 texts before 9am this morning.

As AQL top man, Dr Adam Beaumont explains:

“Companies can store the mobile numbers of staff or customers with us securely in an online list. If they then need to make an emergency announcement – such as to inform staff that the offices are closed due to bad weather - they can just log on and send one message which can then be relayed to their contacts at the touch of a button”.

I asked AQL for a bit of a summary on text usage. They report that the upsurge in messaging was caused by many firms announcing office closures or informing customers of cancelled deliveries or site visits.

Good news. Pleased to see the medium of text getting a good work out!

BlykWatch: Swap to £15 credit winds up some users

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Those of you who are regular readers of the site will know that I covered a series on the site known as BlykWatch, which was where I posted regularly about UK ad funded MVNO Blyk. In September Ewan and I took the decision to retire the series as we felt nothing much was happening with the company. There was nothing to ‘watch’.

Blyk frustrated me; in return for receiving adverts matched to my preferences, and and every other user received 217 texts and 43 minutes per month. No data. No data AT ALL. The regular readers of Blykwatch will know I complained a lot about the lack of some kind of inclusive data along with competitive data rates ‘out of bundle’.

Well, to my delight this evening I received a SMS from Blyk;

You asked, Blyk listened. Blyk will be changing to a free monthly refill of £15 for you to use however you like.

*Fantastic* a company that listened to what the users want! Of course, having ‘a balance’ means you can use it on voice, sms, mms and data. The quid pro quo is immediately a lot more credible in my eyes.

However it comes at a price. At the same time prices on Blyk will now increase with call charges rising to 24p a minute from 15p. That’s STEEP. However text messages fall from 10p to 8p.

Now while this is fantastic for me — I can use my balance just on calls, or data — since I use Blyk as my secondary sim, for those using Blyk as a primary operator of choice, they’re now getting a bit of a raw deal.

The old system gave every user £28.15 credit (which made up the 217 texts/43 minutes). So if you’re used to using 217 texts and 43 minutes each month, that will NOW cost you £27.68.

But now, you’re only getting £15 ‘credit’ as thanks for receiving ads. If you wanted to maintain that same level of minutes/texts, you’d need to spunk out £12.68 extra per month.

That is a 46% percent decrease in credit and in return you get flexibility. I think the 46% is rather expensive for the value that flexibility brings. I understand that for a flexible plan you would expect to lose some credit ie 10 – 20% but certainly NOT 46%.

To me this suggests Blyk simply do not understand their user base. If you use the credit all on minutes you are better off than before the changes, however if you are a SMS user you lose out big style. Blyk is a MVNO only available for those who are aged between 16 and 24, users in this bracket (which I am part of) Text, MSN and Facebook each other. They are prolific texters, not callers.

As soon as I got the message concerning these changes I did a search on twitter to see if anyone had said anything (Ewan if you are reading this twitter IS useful).

Here’s what I sent out to my followers:

“You asked, Blyk listened”: 43 min 217 txt -> £15 +data,mms possibility.43min 217 txt=27.68.Cost of flex: 46% for mms, data. More flexible?

I received many responses — I don’t want to list them all so here’s a good summary one:

Am annoyed Blyk has decided to give £15 credit per month instead of free calls and minutes. It’s basically a guise for giving less.

I also jumped onto the forums, and I realised that Blyk had not sent this message in one go but had done a phased roll out, as a result the forums were very active on this topic. The main bulk were contained in two topics one was ‘bring back the old Blyk’ with 150 replies and a petition as well with 104 posts.

Not only that there are also two online petitions on sites on the internet:
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?217_43
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/no-blyk-bo.html

The first has 92 names, the second has 99 names.

Checking the posts on the forum the first post on the change was on the 15th January at 4pm, so in less than 5 days this has been the response. I have been a user of Blyk for more than a year and a half and have never seen so much response on the forums. I think it clearly shows the opinion of the Blyk members.

I dropped an email to both Jonathan MacDonald and Alistair Crane (both part of the team who set up Blyk) to hear get their views on the changes.

“Businesses change their offerings. All of them. Blyk know more about what people want than all other mobile networks, in my opinion. I hope that that opinions about an offering change don’t cloud, remove or replace the fact that, for the first time ever, a media channel was built upon conversation rather than broadcast. We can and should have an opinion and it is more common for negativity to out-shine the positive. It is the way of the world sadly.”  Jonathan MacDonald

Fair point, but how much conversation was going on when they changed the game plan?

Let’s hear from Alistair:

“In January Blyk launched a comprehensive content portal and will be marketing the service heavily to members based on their profile information. By giving users monetary value to spend on whatever they want Blyk will drive content consumption, offer members an additional free service and most importantly, create increased inventory and another avenue for advertisers to access the profiled member base through traditional WAP formats (banners, text links etc.) as well as more creative pre-rolls, interstitials and ad funded content experiences (games, wall papers, ringtones).

Members will place a MASSIVE amount of value around flexibility and will love the fact that they can now access facebook, maps, email etc. using their free allowance. 

User created MMS will still probably stay low but is a good option to add to the mix.” Alistair Crane

I also got some words from fellow Blyk User and MIR Contributor Samanatha

“When I first heard about this, I’ll admit I was excited and happy. And then the reality of Blyk’s inability to comprehend the needs and desires of their customers finally sank in again. I don’t like moaning, and in fact I’m pleased they’ve finally realised that listening to their members is the right way to go about their business; but when there’s such a loss being made by each individual member, questions have to be raised.”
 

Blyk my final words to you are these, your idea is fantastic and it will work well however you tell me you listen BUT do you really?

Do you *really* understand your member base?

- - - - -

A word from the Editor: Hi there, Ewan here. When you go live and tell your customers that it’s all about the conversation, that you’re listening, that you care, it’s good news. If you mean it. But then I suspect it’s a lot larger to wield the happy stick when you’re running a mobile operator. But… if you’ve asked your users for feedback — and they give you feedback, it gets rather challenging when, for whatever logistical reasons, you can’t necessarily deliver.

Over the months we’ve delivered some rather inspiring commentary on Blyk — chiefly from Ricky, the author of today’s post, and more recently from Samantha. Both are exactly in Blyk’s target range. Both are considered, smart, intelligent individuals, misled by the Blyk concept.

We stopped the BlykWatch coverage a while ago because it began to turn into a broken record. Despite the readers from all across the world — I reckon that a good 20-30,000 tuned in regularly for BlykWatch — when we were continually publishing news about forum posts not being replied to and lax or bored customer service, I thought that was it. Time’s up. It’s an operator. Their job is to deliver as many eyeball conversions as possible for their advertisers. It is not to ‘listen’ to their users and it is most certainly not to react to what users want unless there’s a direct profit. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with this as a business practice. The disconnect is the users — such as Ricky and Samantha and a lot more besides — getting far too passionate about the service. At one point I think I said to Ricky to go and get a T-Mobile account and stop worrying about Blyk. That’s difficult when you feel passionately engaged by the company and when the company simply does not reflect that back. I’m sure Jonathan MacDonald — in his Every Single One Of Us guise — will have something to say about that. It ain’t good. But it makes cash. The Blyk customer is the advertiser. The user is the gateway to cash for Blyk.

Now, here’s is a viewpoint that I doubt will be received well by Ricky, Samantha and the array of Blyk fans they’ve spoken to about the news: It’s free so you have no rights and your opinion doesn’t count. Despite what the marketing tells you.

The only opinion Blyk want to know is whether you liked the Coca Cola or the Pepsi MMS ad better. If it’s a service level you want — you’re much better off demanding service from a traditional offer and wielding your own cash in return, rather than your data/opinions.

Swapping around the credit structure perhaps indicates at a challenge with the Blyk model. According to a BBC stat, there are about 7 million 16-24 year olds in the UK.

200,000 of which have got a Blyk sim card. Or, let’s be generous — let’s call it 300,000. I don’t know the current stats. No one from Blyk has contacted me with an update for years. So let’s work on the basis of 300k ‘penetration’.

Let’s now get real.

Ricky — one of the world’s most passionate Blyk users doesn’t actually use them as his primary account. He uses T-Mobile. So let’s strip a load out.

Let’s assume 300k sim cards activated. Let’s assume 20% converted to become regular Blyk users? I dunno if this is accurate. Let’s keep with it.

20% is 60,000 regular Blyk users.

How many of them are PRIMARY Blyk users — i.e it’s their ONLY mobile operator? That’s a difficult stat. Let’s say…. another 20%? Let’s be kind?

So 12,000 regular, primary users.

Assume 1% of them can be arsed to care about their ‘billing structure’.

Text them and tell them the credit structure is changing and about 100 of them hit the forums complaining. That sounds about right. Now, once again, these stats could be hugely incorrect and I’m happy for us to be corrected by Blyk.

But if they’re anywhere accurate, they’d explain why the company isn’t necessarily screaming about it’s successes and why it may well become necessary for them to shift around the credit structure to reduce their costs by 40-odd percent.

The value with Blyk is surely in the concept. The concept that — all things being equal — the brands are LOVING the ROI. They’re actually getting returns on their investment. Measurable and high percentages. Just, not with millions of teenagers. So I think the concept of Blyk is a success. Whether the MVNO will prove to be so? Well I don’t know. Let’s keep watching and wish them all godspeed.

(And swap to T-Mobile, Samantha.)

The MIR Marketplace has £75k for you this week

Monday, January 12th, 2009

I hope we’ve got £75k for you. Or a similar amount. I’d like to see if I can make you some money. Read on and I’ll explain.

I thoroughly enjoy producing Mobile Industry Review. It’s generally a pleasurable experience, although, inevitably some tasks get a bit annoying now and again.

One task that doesn’t ever get boring is connecting a buyer to a seller.

Here’s a case in point.

Last Tuesday I posted a note about a chap I knew who had a WAP & SMS development requirement. He’d emailed me asking if I had any recommendations. I’ve usually got a few off the top of my head — but I asked the chap if I could post a note about it and see who’s reading. If anyone responded, I arranged to forward the details to him.

Here’s the note I posted:

Hi Ewan,

I am looking for a programmer / developer to do some SMS and WAP based applications and games tied into TV properties that want monetizing. Any ideas where i can advertise or know any one free and based in UK.

Thanks

I won’t go into specifics on results for this because, as far as I know, discussions are still taking place. Suffice to say I was able to connect him with interested parties within hours.

Now that’s great. Great for him, great for the developers who emailed in. There’s a possibility of business.

Another case in point.

Two weeks ago — at the turn of the year, I had another email from a lady this time. She was after a particular supplier of equipment and mobile related services. Alas she didn’t want anything published on the site. So I racked my brains, fired off a few emails and woosh, a deal was struck. It looks to be about £75,000 worth of business over this coming year. Fantastic.

A final case in point. Last year, I think we connected about £1.2m quid’s worth of ‘venture’ investment. That is, me pointing firms looking for money in the direction of venture capitalists or angel investors.

If we lived in an era of ‘perfect information’ — as the economists put it — where everyone knows everything about everything, then we’d all be fine.

But we don’t. Even Google isn’t that good when you’re looking for something specialist. And time after time I get emails from people looking to buy products and services. And, alas, my range is limited. Limited because, I’m willing to bet, that whilst I do KNOW a lot of people, I probably don’t know you, dear reader. Not when the internet is so big and when our audience is pretty far reaching.

Business is inevitably difficult at the moment. Budgets are being pulled, speculative projects are being shelved — and ‘no one ever got fired for buying IBM’. That famous and rather depressing phrase is reigning supreme at the moment. Hardly anyone is taking chances. Given the choice, folk would rather not spend any money. Especially if they are an employee, worried about their job prospects.

Business still continues though. People still need their hair cut. We still need to eat. And people still need to buy mobile services and products — though, perhaps with a little more due diligence and, frankly, with a little bit more information to hand.

Which is where, I hope, the Mobile Industry Review Marketplace comes in.

It’s a hair-brained half-plausible concept that I am not sure if it will work. To work, it relies entirely 100% on you. I can see it working with your assistance. But I can also see it not even getting off the ground.

Here’s the concept:

1. Email me and tell me what you’re looking to buy. Give as much (or as little detail) as you wish. Identify your company or don’t. It’s your choice.

2. Email me and tell me what you’re looking to sell. Your services, products and the like. Likewise, identify you company, or don’t.

3. If you’re in the unlikely position of having money to invest in the mobile arena, drop me a note. Similarly if you’re looking for money, email me with brief details and we’ll get the notes up.

Keep both emails to 3 sentences in length. Include a web address if you wish.

I’ll publish both in a daily marketplace post. Daily might be pushing it if nobody bothers with this, mind you. Maybe weekly to begin with. I’ll also knock up a Craigslist random email address thing. So that readers can contact you directly - without revealing your actual email address.

The fee? None. No fee. Your attention is good enough for me. Although if you do strike a shocking deal, consider buying some advertising to help us keep the lights on here.

It’s a bit of processing work on our end but I reckon the value could be really, really useful for a lot of people.

Shall we try it? I’d like to see if we can help.

The email address to use: ewan@mobileindustryreview.com

And, if you can, put a subject like: “Marketplace: Sell’ or ‘Marketplace: Buy’ to indicate what you’re after.


. PercentMobile Tracking