Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone?...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that...

Facebook in hot water for ‘dirty texts’

Link: Facebook sued for mis-sending dirty texts | The Register

News in from the legal trigger-happy land of the free (via The Register) – Facebook is being sued by an Indiana woman for sending ‘adult content’ via text.

Earlier this week, an Indiana mommy named Lindsey Abrams filed a federal class action suit against the Microsoft-propped social networking site. She’s claiming that it sends thousands of unauthorized text messages to innocent bystanders across the country – and that many of these messages contain “adult content”.

The whole thing seems to come down to a single problem: number recycling. Facebook allows you to sign up with your mobile to receive text alerts when people send you messages, and charges you for each message received. So far, so good. The problem is that they have no idea if you’re still using that number – so it’s possible that, due to the mobile operators number recycling policy, you can end up with the number of someone already registered on Facebook when you take out a new contract.

El Reg cites Santa Clara University law professor and tech law blogger Eric Goldman, who reckons the action will be dismissed under the US Communications Decency Act.

“[The act] states that websites are not liable for what their users say or do,” he told the The Reg. “User provide the telephone numbers. Users provide the messages being sent. And Facebook just forwards them. It may be annoying to get a message that isn’t directed to you, but Facebook isn’t to blame – just you can’t blame the telephone company when someone makes a crank call.”

1 COMMENT

  1. Companies distributing mobile content should have access to the disconnect lists from the major carriers through their aggregators. We would recommend treating this scenario like a mobile subscription and requiring a periodic opt-in (or an opt-out…) message so the receiver can confirm they are the intended receiver and are still interested. The number of outbound messages can also be throttled by the publisher or software provider to a reasonable number to avoid spamming.

    Some may attempt to bypass the “right way” to distribute mobile content via the carriers’ e-mail-to-SMS gateways, but companies following best practices in the industry can easily avoid situations like this one. You can find best practices guidelines online from the Mobile Marketing Association and CTIA.

    Matt Silk
    msilk@waterfallmobile.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recently Published

Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an HP LaserJet printer (version 3, if memory serves), I have been printing with an HP. Over the...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone? I'm asking because I'm thinking about what I should be doing. When I was living in Oman, I...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that next to nothing from Mobile World Congress would break through into the mainstream media. I was right,...

How Wireless Will Pave the Path to Neobank Profitability

I'm delighted to bring you an opinion piece from Rafa Plantier at Gigs.com. I think it's particularly relevant given the recent eSIM news from...

An end of an era: Vodafone UK turns off 3G services

I thought it was worthwhile highlighting this one from the Vodafone UK team. For so long - for what feels like years, seeing the...

Mobile World Congress: Did the mainstream media notice?

I resolved this year to make sure I wrote something - anything - about Mobile World Congress, the huge mobile industry trade show taking...