Archive for the ‘Devices’ Category

Parrot AR.Drone: Crying out for your mobile development attention!

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Whenever I’m briefing device manufacturers — you know, standing in front of 30 product managers and jumping up in down in front of a PowerPoint — I always make the point that they need to make their devices cool. If you’re Apple, this happens automatically — but if you’re anyone else, you have to work at it. Because people create really cool things for the iPhone. Here’s an example:

The Parrot AR.Drone, the darling of this year’s CES, is a super, super example of a device that will have millions of people thinking, ‘shit, I really need to get an iPhone‘.

Got an iPhone? (Or an iPod Touch?)

Good! Yes, you too can control a mini quadricopter device from your iPhone.

I kid ye not.

Have a look at this:

That there is a helicopter-style flying Drone, complete with on-board camera and super-genius computer to make the thing hover, take off, land and otherwise make every male within 20ft WANT one. Immediately.

Here’s how it works: The Drone creates a WiFi network that you connect your iPhone to. Doing so gives you control over the Drone’s movements. It’ll take off and hover at 1 metre height whilst it waits for your instructions. If someone bumps into it or pushes it away, it’s on-board gadgetry will stabilise it and keep it hovering whilst you feel like a Prince Among Men as you get your flying googles on.

To fly the device you simply move your phone about. The Drone’s app (that you’re running on the iPhone) interprets your movements and translates them into flying instructions. On the app, you get a real-time video feed from the on-board camera that you can use to guide the device when you can’t see it. So you could theoretically use this at the office to really wind up your colleagues in the next room without leaving your desk. Genius!

You get 15 minutes flying time from one charge.

And now let’s talk about augmented reality.

Yes, I shit ye not. Because you’re being fed back a live video image of what the Drone is seeing, the iPhone app can overlay that with all manner of different games. For example, the supplied app will allow you to fight and blow up other virtual Drones.

Or if you’d like to get sexy, you can actually do a multiplayer mode — you can recreate an aerial fight between two Drones, by using your virtual canon and missiles to (virtually) shoot down your friend’s Drone. Love it. Those are just some sample applications. You can sign-up and develop some iPhone/iPod Touch applications to interface with the Drone. I can’t begin to imagine the possibilities!

So if you’re an iPhone developer, you should immediately go and get a Drone prototype (there are going to be a limited number available from Feb 15th) and start developing super-shit-hot augmented reality apps.

Fantastic. I will be buying one of these. Will you?

Here’s a video of the Drone in action…

And the Parrot/Drone site? It’s here.

N900 beats iPhone in mobile usability test

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Peter-Paul Koch is a man after my own heart. He routinely has 10+ mobile devices on his desk at any one time (on account of being a mobile platform strategist, amongst other things). When one of his friends asked his advice on buying a new handset, he saw the opportunity to do a real-time usability test of all the major handsets at once. It’s a true normob test — the friend in question is currently using a super-super-old Nokia.

If the phone UI area interests you, I strongly recommend you take a bit of time to read Peter-Paul’s exhaustive write-up. It’s a beautiful piece, it really is.

Thanks to Kevin Neely in sunny San Francisco for sending me the link to Peter-Paul’s post. Kevin knows a thing or two about mobile — indeed he’s one of the most knowledgeable and obsessive (in a good way) mobile super-users I know. So much so that I caught Kevin on camera last summer when I was in the Valley. Do also take a bit of time to see what he had to say on the subject of mobile applications:

HTC Smart is the world’s first ‘budget smartphone’ (running Brew!)

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

When I saw the above device, the HTC Smart, I did a double-take.

BREW?

I’d heard the rumblings of HTC’s latest foray into a new market segment (“the budget smartphone’) with Brew, but I’d never thought it would look as good as it does.

So. Meet the HTC Smart. This is the first in a new category of (quoting from today’s release) ‘easy-to-use, connected smartphones that are accessible by people all over the world.’

Accessible can be read in two ways: User interface (it looks pretty nice) and Price. There’s no word on actual cost but HTC are using the word ‘affordable’ often to describe the Smart. And that’s quite exciting. I’m not a massive fan of the Brew platform myself, particularly given most of the devices I’ve seen using it have had pretty shocking interfaces. But I am a big fan of bringing mobile to the masses. To do that you need devices to be affordable.

And easy. I haven’t managed to play with one yet but I’m hopeful that the HTC Sense user-interface (which is now setting HTC apart nicely from other manufacturers) will be implemented nicely in this device. With Sense, of course, you’ve got all the social networking goodness that will hopefully be right up the alley of the target audience.

The Smart has 256MB of RAM and ROM, a decent screen (2.8″ touch-sensitive), HSDPA support and a 3.0 megapixel camera. In fact, here’s the full spec list:

I could imagine mobile operators in the right markets shifting quite a lot of these.

The LG TV that’s as thin as a £1 coin

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

I was pretty impressed to read about the new LG OLED TVs that are on their way. Obviously the ramifications of the technology for the mobile marketplace are significant, particularly if you can overlay a functional touchscreen on top to create a 21″ 0.25cm thin ‘tablet’.

My interest in the new range of LG TVs is personal too. I’ve been due a television upgrade for years. When I got my place in Euston, London, a while ago, I’d just got together — formally — with my wife and we had begun the long road to marriage, which, as is generally acknowledged, involves quite some degree of compromise. On the part of the male, of course.

I took my future wife shopping to PC World. Or Currys. One of those retail places. I intended spending about 500 pounds on a good TV. But I was secretly well up for being sold a huge big ‘entertainment system’ at well over £1,000. I was hoping for an enterprising sales chap to convince us both.

My heart fell when my future wife pointed with delight at some bollocks 19″ flat-panel Sony. She commented that it looked really attractive. I thought it was ridiculously small. In her previous residence she got by with a TV of a similar size. I’m by no means blind, but if I’m going to spend a bit of time watching TV, I want to be able to see it. BIG. We began a series of negotiations, with me pointing to the big big BIG TVs whilst she looked at me strangely.

Her contention was that a big TV would spoil the lines of the room at my place. Given she was moving in, I gave due deference to her perspective.

It’s a fair point.

But then again, friends of mine have 32″ flat-panels in their KITCHENS. Their KITCHENS!

I thought she was also having an issue with cost. Since we were moving in together, you know, wouldn’t that money I was intending blowing on a TV be better used buying bed sheets?

We ended up with a mega-compromise.

A 32-inch Poloroid flat-panel TV for £349. It does have two HDMIs and I had to immediately replace the rubbish speakers with set of JBL Creature speakers I had hanging around.

It is OK.

A friend of ours who has a management position at Currys (and, of course, has a flippin’ massive, gorgeous, shiny proper-brand TV) couldn’t quite believe we’d bought a Poloroid. It’s an utter embarrassment from a branding perspective.

But it does work.

And the wife and I are now in agreement. Big TVs are the way ahead — because, as she often points out, they’re critical to allow proper viewing of the dresses on Strictly Come Dancing.

I have, thus, gently begun a little look around for a replacement, 32″ minimum.

And I think one of these LG OLEDs will do nicely. They launch in the UK toward the end of the year at 15″. But there will be much bigger sizes by next year. Nice.

iPhone’s single-task operating system renders it a poor man’s Nokia

Monday, December 21st, 2009

This afternoon it was snowing in Chiswick. That is unusual because it’s so near the city of London which seems to give off a load of heat meaning that whilst everyone else in the area is deluged in snow at the moment, we’ve had a bit of rain.

Only this afternoon, something strange happened with the weather and woosh, down came the snow.

I was on my way to get some shopping when it did. I thought I’d record the moment with my iPhone 3GS.

I took pretty decent photo of some snow falling. Here it is, as a matter of fact:

I took the picture using the Flickr app. Of course there are multiple methods of taking pictures and transmitting them to places via the iPhone. But I decided to use Flickr.

I used the ‘capture from camera’ function now familiar to us all. I confirmed I was happy with the photo and hit ‘upload’.

And that’s when my trouble started.

Yes I was on Orange’s pretty good 3G network BUT I’d chosen to upload the image in full 2048×1536 resolution. And why not?

So I stood there, waiting.

Like a total plumb.

Like a total flippin’ idiot.

I stood and waited whilst the fantastically good looking blue bar slowly moved itself along the page indicating the upload journey. All around me, people on the street stared. I didn’t want to put the phone in my pocket because… well… the touchscreen might accidentally do something. I obviously couldn’t switch the phone’s screen off because that’s bad practice when your iPhone can only do one thing at a time.

So I waited.

I hung around cursing the iPhone and the one-thing-at-a-time operating system chugged along.

I waited some more.

I thought to myself, ‘What the fluck am I doing, standing in the street, waiting for my technology to perform?’

The whole concept, you see, was not to snap a picture — the iPhone can do that very nicely now — but to capture-transmit-and-share my experience.

I should have taken my Nokia N86 with me. Running ShoZu. It’s gorgeous camera would have done a much better job — but the whole experience would have been about a billion times better. Here’s why. For those who don’t know (and there are a lot of you), here’s how the Nokia platform — allied with ShoZu (or using Nokia’s own Ovi share service) works:

With the Nokia N86:

1. Take out the phone, activate the camera
2. Snap the picture — the picture is automatically tagged with your GPS location
3. Check you are happy with the picture
4. 2 seconds later, the ShoZu app prompts you: “Send this to Flickr?” You click “Ok”
5. Put the phone back in your pocket, get on with your day
6. Total time commitment: 4-5 seconds

With the iPhone:
1. Take out the phone. Because I want to share immediately, I activate my application of choice — in this case, Flickr. But I could have used ShoZu, Tweetie, Twitpic Uploader or a ton of other apps
2. Click on the ‘grab from camera’ option
3. Snap the picture
4. Press upload and wait whilst the stupid blue line inches across the screen
5. Total time commitment: 30-90 seconds, depending on network speed

The Nokia user model wins hands down. (Although I agree that the rest of the user model isn’t quite on par with the iPhone).

I understand that I could have taken the photo on the iPhone and just kept it in my ‘album’ for when I got home — or for when I got near a fast hotspot. But what I wanted to do was share immediately.

And the iPhone sucks at this.

It totally blows.

I found myself longing for the N86 because the experience would have been so much better, so quicker, so much smoother.

Sadly it doesn’t appear as though multi-tasking is coming any time soon to the iPhone. I’ll tell you why. A few months ago, I was at a meal where a senior, senior Apple iPhone person was in attendance. I gave a commitment never to mention the precise location his or her identify, or their job title. I’ll refer to them as a ‘chap’ but they could well be female. I was one of the only Europeans in attendance (so, yeah, the location was somewhere in North America) and the chap from Apple was holding court on our table.

We all took it in turns to politely fire questions at the chap. Everyone around him threw him warm and fuzzy questions about how-much-they-loved-the-iPhone (and so on). There were, incidentally, iPhones in every hand. I had my iPhone and my (ageing) N95. When my turn came, I asked about multi-task support.

The chap leaned forward ignoring the rest of the group.

“Tell me why? Why do you want that?” he asked.

“Err, well…” I replied, slightly surprised. From his demeanour, I inferred that this was an issue he (or she) had been exploring in-depth with other Apple people.

I continued, “If I’m using Google Maps and I need to look at my calendar, I don’t want to have to lose my position, or if I’m running a particular application — of which, as we all know, there are TONS — I don’t want to have to ’start again’ when I click the main menu.”

I’m sad to say that at this point the chap’s (or lady’s) eyes appeared to glaze over. I’d lost him.

I tried again.

“When I’m running Evernote,” I explained, “I have to WAIT for it to upload things before I can quit. I’d like it to do that in the background?”

The chap deployed a strategically placed fake smile at me — intimating to the rest of the group that I was a total weirdo and that no sane person would ever want to do this.

So I don’t think we’ll have multi-tasking for a little while yet. Which is a shame. I’m getting very, very tired having to think in a linear fashion with my iPhone.

It is for this reason that my primary handset is a (multi-task capable) BlackBerry — mostly because I really, really like the physical keyboard. I then typically carry an iPhone 3GS and/or my N86 as a secondary device.

I’d like to see some Android devices with proper N86-standard cameras at some point too. Won’t somebody please make an Android device with a decent QWERTY keyboard and a proper camera (not just a high spec megapixel one that’s not any good) with decent flash?

Is anyone else getting annoyed by the one-thing-at-a-time iPhone user model? Does anyone else get an elicit buzz out of hitting ‘email’ and letting the device automatically check email in the background? ;-)

Orrrr… is it just me?

The Nexus One won’t tempt me away from the iPhone

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

It’s Jonathan Mulholland here once again!

Like most mobile geeks, I’m really enjoying all the Google Nexus One news; it’s starting to sound like a very nice device, and it’s obviously a very interesting move by Google. Seeing their vision of what a modern mobile device should be — and how far Google feel they can push their services into our pockets will be fascinating to see.

I’ve already pretty much decided that I’m going to give the Nexus One / HTC Passion — or whatever it ends up being called — a miss though. Not because I’m a total Apple fanboy, or because I’m one of those crazies worried about giving Google too much access to my data – I’m a very heavy user of all of Google’s services, and have been ever since I opened my first Gmail account back in 2005.

Why the reluctance then?  Android has many positives – mobile Gmail is great, Google Maps on Android is better than on iPhone, multitasking rocks and Android’s notification system is just plain brilliant.  But at the end of the day – from my experience (G1, HTC Magic and HTC Hero) – Android is actually a pretty sucky phone.

I think Ewan hit the nail on the head yesterday:

My biggest concern with Google is their apparent inability to bring anything to market that is actually ready for consumers to use. I’m talking, of course, about the perennial ‘beta’ labels that populate their technology. This beta policy makes a ton of sense — and I think the majority of geeks like me are thoroughly delighted to see the company make frequent updates to their services. I wonder, then, how they’re reacting to delivering a physical product that can’t be changed.

To say that the Android phone experience is a bit unpolished (even when tarted up by HTC) would be a massive complement; take the iPhone away from your ear to “press option 3 to speak to an advisor” and the screen lights up ready for use – easy!  Try the same trick with an HTC Hero and the screen will have locked.  Go to press the phones usual screen unlock key and you’ll often have killed the call.   It’s this kind of thoughtfulness that I think Android phones will always lack, mainly because Android devs don’t have a maniacal Steve Jobs standing over them yelling – “not good enough, do it again.”

The iPhone might have limitations — and the App approval process does appear to make some rather perverse decisions — but Apple’s rigid control of the platform undoubtedly makes it slicker.  We had to wait far too long for ‘copy and paste’ to appear, but when it did it was perfect.  Does any other device honestly have this feature implemented as well as the iPhone?

I’m also rather dubious about one of the Nexus One’s really big selling points — availability as a carrier unlocked device.  If this is true I really applaud the move, it could be a watershed moment for the telco industry, but I’m just not sure Google will be able to pull this off.  They don’t have consumer goods distribution experience; I suppose they could rely on HTC’s sales channels, but this would be a really big ask.   Google has previously given away unlocked Android devices to developers only, could they be dong the same with the Nexus One, planning to release the device to the public via one of the carriers (my money would be on T-Mobile)?

Then there is my final nagging doubt; good as the Nexus One may be, in my mind it’s really a second generation future mobile device (1st gen = iPhone, 2nd gen = iPhone 3G/3GS).   I’m sure it will stack up well against the iPhone 3GS, Palm Pre etc, but really we’re still watching Android play catch-up.

I still predict that the really big mobile news of 2010 will be the major update Apple announces to the iPhone platform in June, so for the meantime I’m sticking with Apple.

Google’s Nexus One phone is tentatively revealed

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Finally a phone from Google, eh?

The geniuses at Engadget report that this is the Google Phone — or, as they appear to be calling it, the Nexus One.

I’ve been hearing a lot about this for some time — but only in terms of advanced rumour and conjecture.

My biggest concern with Google is their apparent inability to bring anything to market that is actually ready for consumers to use. I’m talking, of course, about the perennial ‘beta’ labels that populate their technology. This beta policy makes a ton of sense — and I think the majority of geeks like me are thoroughly delighted to see the company make frequent updates to their services.

I wonder, then, how they’re reacting to delivering a physical product that can’t be changed. Oh, you can change the operating system and UI with an upgrade, but you can’t change the buttons or any physical characteristics. I’m really interested to see what they’ve done there.

Engadget reports that the device is actually manufactured by HTC — but with fastidious specification by the Google team.

We shall see.

There are a number of exciting questions posed by the introduction of a Google Phone, not least the cost of the device. Will the average search revenue from a handset enable Google to deeply discount the device? It doesn’t look cheap.

And what SIM card do you put in? Obviously if it’s a directly retailed device, it’ll be unlocked and usable on any GSM carrier. Which begs the question of when we’ll be able to get a SIM with the Google Phone.

Getting carried away for a moment, what would happen if Google put 10 million of these devices into the market across 2010, free. If you could just ’sign-up’ and — much like the Wave invite plan — get an ‘invite’ to receive a free Google phone?

And how would mobile operators react if Google went to the market and said ‘We need 10 million SIM cards, each with the following service plans activated’?

Would the mobile operators reject the deal, would they offer ridiculous terms? Would they — with the term ‘dumb pipe’ staring them in the face — do a deal with Google quicker than their competitor?

2010 should be a stimulating year.

Meantime I recommend visiting the Engadget site and browsing through their text and their Nexus photos.

Tesco’s iPhone 3G: £222 + £20/mth, 3GS free @ £60/mth

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Here’s the news straight from the Tesco release….

iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS will be available to Tesco customers from just £20 a month, the lowest monthly contract price in the UK market. Tesco Mobile will also offer the first ever 12 month iPhone contract in the UK. Tesco Mobile will be the first mobile network to offer iPhone 3GS 16GB for free with unlimited calls, texts, and browsing, on a 24 month contract, for £60 a month.*

Here’s the schedule…

image001

All the details you need: http://www.tescomobileiphone.com/

The release concludes with this statement:

With 42 million shopping visitors a week into Tesco stores, and great value price plans on offer, the network expects consumer demand to be extremely high.

I wonder just how many impulse purchases Tesco will be able to generate…


Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter